Bitcoin To Challenge Gold? Expert Sees US Taking The Lead
Matthew Sigel, head of digital asset research at VanEck, recently commented on Bitcoin Becoming a global monetary standard similar to gold has sparked controversy. This view is gathering strength, especially as the debate over the U.S. strategic Bitcoin reserve intensifies.
Related reading
The future of finance: Bitcoin’s role
Siegel said Bitcoin has the potential to have a major impact on the future of global finance. He asserted that the establishment of cryptocurrencies strategic reserve The number of Bitcoins issued by the U.S. government, estimated at 1 million, could establish the leading crypto asset as a new form of currency.
This concept is reminiscent of the historical period in which the country accumulated gold to enhance their economic capabilities. Siegel believes this could make the United States the standard-bearer of a new financial era.
The gold standard once defined reserve assets.
Now, Bitcoin offers the opportunity to incorporate a “digital standard” for money.
It is likely to echo gold’s role in reshaping global finance. pic.twitter.com/e1ogPe947R— matthew sigel, resuming CFA (@matthew_sigel) January 10, 2025
Gold VS. Bitcoin: Lessons from History
Comparing cryptocurrencies to gold is not new, but it has gained traction recently as more governments experiment with digital currencies.
Gold is often viewed as a safe haven and reliable store of wealth, but Bitcoin offers unique advantages not found in other commodities. It is essentially a digital asset, so unlike gold, transfers are fast and more portable. This digital nature makes it less susceptible to physical theft and facilitates cross-border transactions.
While mining helps produce gold, Bitcoin is inherently rare as its supply is limited to 21 million coins. This planned scarcity could make Bitcoin an attractive alternative for those trying to offset economic uncertainty and inflation.
Global views and reactions
Global interest in Bitcoin’s potential is growing. Due to recent political shifts in the United States, countries such as El Salvador have designated Bitcoin as legal tender, and leaders in other countries are trying to implement similar policies. However, given the unstable nature of Bitcoin and the stable purchasing power of gold, some economists believe this movement should be rejected.
Related reading
Despite Bitcoin’s contemporary advantages such as decentralization and freedom from government interference, critics argue that its price volatility could be a barrier to its widespread adoption as a medium of exchange. As a result, the two assets differ in key factors that investors and policymakers need to consider.
Siegel’s words reflect renewed interest in how Bitcoin can reconfigure the global financial system. Supporters and detractors alike will be watching to see how the story unfolds in the coming years as discussions continue over whether it will eventually become the global standard alongside gold. Perhaps the future of currency depends on how these two assets evolve and interact in an increasingly digital economy.
Featured images from Pexels, charts from TradingView
